Brandt v. City of Westminster, Colorado, The et al
Plaintiff: Eric Brandt
Defendant: City of Westminster, Colorado, The, Charles Rush, Ray Esslinger, Charles (I) Rush and Ray (I) Esslinger
Case Number: 1:2016cv01356
Filed: June 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Craig B. Shaffer
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 63 Order on Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 37 is DENIED; Defendants' Combined Motion for Summary Judgment 37 is GRANTED IN PART. by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/19/2018. (wjmlc2, )
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Adopting May 1, 2017 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 24 ) is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge' s Recommendation (ECF No. 41 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety; Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 48 ) to the Magistrate Judges Recommendation is OVERRULED. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/19/2017. (angar, ) Modified on to edit text 7/19/2017 (angar, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandt v. City of Westminster, Colorado, The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Brandt
Represented By: David Arthur Lane
Represented By: Andrew Joseph McNulty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Westminster, Colorado, The
Represented By: Courtney B. Kramer
Represented By: Thomas Sullivan Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Rush
Represented By: Courtney B. Kramer
Represented By: Thomas Sullivan Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray Esslinger
Represented By: Courtney B. Kramer
Represented By: Thomas Sullivan Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles (I) Rush
Represented By: Courtney B. Kramer
Represented By: Thomas Sullivan Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ray (I) Esslinger
Represented By: Courtney B. Kramer
Represented By: Thomas Sullivan Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?