Cochlear Ltd. et al v. Oticon Medical AB et al
Cochlear Ltd. and Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB |
Oticon Medical AB and Oticon Medical LLC |
1:2016cv01700 |
July 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX Outside US |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 ORDER denying 59 Motion to Strike or, in the Alternative, for Leave to File Supplemental Declaration Regarding Principles of Swedish Law ; Granted in part and Denied in part 31 MOTION to Enforce Arbitration Agreement and Stay Litig ation Pending Resolution of Arbitration by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 09/25/2017. The motion is granted to the extent it seeks to compel plaintiffs to arbitrate the claims that they assert in this action against defendants and requests that this ca se be administratively closed. The motion is denied to the extent that it requests a stay of this action. The parties shall proceed to binding arbitration in a manner consistent with the agreement attached to the motion to compel arbitration. This a ction shall be administratively closed, subject to reopening for good cause, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. Not later than twenty days after the completion of the arbitration proceeding, the parties shall file a status report advising the Court whether they believe the case should be reopened for good cause for any further proceedings in this Court or whether the case may be dismissed. (sphil, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.