Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Western Distributing Company
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| Western Distributing Company |
| 1:2016cv01727 |
| July 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1149
ORDER ON DEFENDANT WESTERN'S POST-TRIAL MOTIONS. The Court ORDERS: 1. Western's Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (ECF No. 1098 ) is DENIED; and 2. Western's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Denial of Its Yet-to-be-filed Rule 50(b) Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth herein. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 01/31/2024. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing
1090
ORDER DENYING PARTIES' CONSTRUED RULE 50(b) MOTIONS by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/2023. (trvo, )
|
|
Filing
1047
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE. EEOC's Motion in Limine to Exclude Western's Proposed Testimony and/or Exhibits 976 is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART AS MOOT, to the extent set forth herein. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/6/2023.(trvo, )
|
|
Filing
1028
ORDER Denying 821 Defendant's Corrected Amended Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/22/2022.(trvo, )
|
|
Filing
1026
ORDER Denying 823 EEOC's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/21/2022.(trvo, )
|
|
Filing
977
ORDER ON RULE 702 MOTIONS CONCERNING TRIAL TESTIMONY. Defendant's Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Arthur Gutman, Ph.D. at Trial 911 is DENIED. Defendant's Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of P laintiff EEOC's Expert Catherine L. Schelly at Trial 912 is DENIED. EEOC's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Dr. Michael Ladwig and Dr. Hector Brignoni 918 is DENIED AS MOOT. EEOC's Motion to Limit Opinions and Testimony of Defense Expert Natalie P. Hartenbaum 919 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. EEOC's Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Defense Expert Margot Burns 922 is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART AS MOOT. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/1/2022.(trvo, )
|
|
Filing
957
ORDER ON 702 MOTIONS FILED IN CONJUNCTION WITH SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING. Defendant's Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Arthur Gutman, Ph.D. 884 is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED AS MOOT in part . Defendant's Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff's Expert Catherine L. Schelly 888 is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED AS MOOT in part. Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Defense Expert Jimmy Sill 890 is DENIED. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/22/2022.(trvo, )
|
|
Filing
239
ORDER Appointing Special Master. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 53, Judge Boyd Boland is APPOINTED MASTER for the purpose of resolving discovery disputes referred to the Master by this Court, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5/22/2019. (agarc, )
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER granting 98 Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to Add an Aggrieved Individual, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 1/3/18. (nmarb, )
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/21/16. 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is denied, and 31 MOTION to Strike is granted in part. (dkals, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
