McGee v. Nordstrom Cherry Creek Rack
Plaintiff: Nicole Q McGee
Defendant: Nordstrom Cherry Creek Rack
Case Number: 1:2016cv02715
Filed: November 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Lewis T. Babcock
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 13 Nordstrom's Motion to Dismiss and for Order Compelling Arbitration, or in the Alternative, to Stay Action Pending Arbitration. The parties shall arbitrate Ms. McGee's claims. This action is dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/14/2017. (ebuch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGee v. Nordstrom Cherry Creek Rack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Q McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nordstrom Cherry Creek Rack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?