Kurlander v. Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Colorado District Court Kurlander v. Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC

Kurlander v. Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC

Plaintiff:	Kirstin Kurlander
Defendant:	Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC
Case Number:	1:2016cv02754
Filed:	November 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	Arapahoe
Presiding Judge:	Wiley Y. Daniel
Presiding Judge:	Nina Y. Wang
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12181
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 13, 2018	Filing 75 ORDER that Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement ECF No. 66 is GRANTED. Further it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered along with and in accordance with the Consent Decree signed by the Cour t on April 12, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference, and the settlement reflected therein is given final approval. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purposes of interpreting and enforcing the Consent Decree, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/13/2018. (evana, )
July 20, 2017	Filing 45 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/20/17 DENYING 26 Defendant's Motion for Protective Order and To Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum. Consonant with this courts findings as stated herein, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT the [#30] Opposition to Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, and the Parties shall disregard the [#44] Minute Order directing them to file an associated motion to restrict on or before July 21, 2017. (nmarb, )

Date Filed

Document Text

April 13, 2018

Filing 75 ORDER that Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement ECF No. 66 is GRANTED. Further it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment is entered along with and in accordance with the Consent Decree signed by the Cour t on April 12, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference, and the settlement reflected therein is given final approval. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purposes of interpreting and enforcing the Consent Decree, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 4/13/2018. (evana, )

July 20, 2017

Filing 45 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/20/17 DENYING 26 Defendant's Motion for Protective Order and To Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum. Consonant with this courts findings as stated herein, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to UNRESTRICT the [#30] Opposition to Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, and the Parties shall disregard the [#44] Minute Order directing them to file an associated motion to restrict on or before July 21, 2017. (nmarb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kurlander v. Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirstin Kurlander
Represented By:	Amy Farr Robertson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?