Janny v. Gamez et al
| Mark Janny |
| John Gamez, Lorraine Diaz de Leon, Jim Unknown and Mark Unknown |
| 1:2016cv02840 |
| November 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Larimer |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
327
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 299 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 11/14/2023.(jtorr, )
|
|
Filing
276
APPOINTMENT ORDER. In light of the remand for trial by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Janny v. Gamez, 8 F.4th 883 (10th Cir. 2021), and Plaintiff's pro se status, and in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 15, th e Court hereby determines that Plaintiff merits appointment of counsel drawn from the Civil Pro Bono Panel. The Clerk shall select, notify, and appoint counsel to represent Plaintiff in this civil matter, including by seeking the assistance of the Pro Bono Mediation Panel. Plaintiff is advised that the Clerk will select counsel from the Panel; however, there is no guarantee that Panel members will undertake representation in every case selected as part of the Pilot Program. The Court caut ions that Plaintiff is responsible for all scheduled matters, including hearings, depositions, motions, and trial. Plaintiff shall file a status report, on or before July 20, 2022, stating how he wishes to proceed with this case, regardless of whether counsel is appointed. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 5/20/2022. (trvo, )
|
|
Filing
239
ORDER granting 215 and 216 Motions for Summary Judgment. Judgment shall enter accordingly. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/21/2020. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER Plaintiff's 132 Objection to the 110 Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is SUSTAINED and the 110 Recommendation in ACCEPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART; Program Defendants' 97 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Counts Two and Three; and, States Defendants' 99 Motion to Dismiss in Part is GRANTED. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 3/5/2019. (cthom, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
