Thane v. Geico Casualty Company

Thane v. Geico Casualty Company

Plaintiff:	Jodie Thane
Defendant:	Geico Casualty Company
Case Number:	1:2016cv02940
Filed:	December 1, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	Denver
Presiding Judge:	Christine M. Arguello
Presiding Judge:	Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2017	Filing 72 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order; and granting in part and denying in part 46 Moore's Verified Motion to Quash Subpoena by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 07/25/2017. On or before 8/8/2017, Moore shall produce to GEICO all responsive written communications withheld on the basis of attorney-client privilege. On or before 8/8/2017, Azar shall produce to GEICO all written communications between the Plaintiff and Fischel or any other Azar employee drafted during the underlying litigation regarding settlement offers made by Farrell during the underlying litigation. Finally, on or before 8/8/2017 and in accordance with this order, GEICO may file a motion to compel the production of documents listed in the Plaintiffs and Moores privilege logs as withheld pursuant to the work-product doctrine, in accordance with this order. (mdave, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2017

Filing 72 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 44 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order; and granting in part and denying in part 46 Moore's Verified Motion to Quash Subpoena by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 07/25/2017. On or before 8/8/2017, Moore shall produce to GEICO all responsive written communications withheld on the basis of attorney-client privilege. On or before 8/8/2017, Azar shall produce to GEICO all written communications between the Plaintiff and Fischel or any other Azar employee drafted during the underlying litigation regarding settlement offers made by Farrell during the underlying litigation. Finally, on or before 8/8/2017 and in accordance with this order, GEICO may file a motion to compel the production of documents listed in the Plaintiffs and Moores privilege logs as withheld pursuant to the work-product doctrine, in accordance with this order. (mdave, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thane v. Geico Casualty Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jodie Thane
Represented By:	Michael Henry Jackson Born
Represented By:	Patricia A. Meester
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Geico Casualty Company
Represented By:	Meloney Cargil Perry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?