Lifted Limited, LLC v. Novelty Inc.

Plaintiff: Lifted Limited, LLC
Defendant: Novelty Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv03135
Filed: December 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Mesa
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2023 Filing 292 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/3/2023, re: 290 Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Motion for Oral Argument is DENIED. ORDERED that 225 Defendant Walmart, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DEN IED in part. ORDERED that 226 Defendant Novelty Inc.'s Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED that plaintiff's damages pursuant to its first claim for patent infringement are limited to those incurred after July 27, 2017 regarding defendant Walmart Inc. (jtorr, )
March 31, 2022 Filing 288 ORDER denying 228 Motion to Strike 228 MOTION to Strike THE SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT OF MICHAEL PELLEGRINO AS INEXCUSABLY UNTIMELY by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/31/21.(GPG)
September 30, 2021 Filing 275 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/30/2021, re: 200 Novelty Inc.'s Motion to Decline Subject Matter Jurisdiction for Illegality is DENIED. (sphil, )
May 27, 2020 Filing 162 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/27/2020, 153 parties' Joint Motion for Determination is GRANTED. ORDERED that the 655 Patent is construed as follows: An ornamental design for a lighter holder and tool as shown in Fig ures 1-7. Any purely functional features, such as the size and shape of the central lighter recess, should not be considered in determining infringement, except to the extent that those features contribute to the overall appearance of the claimed design. (sphil, )
March 6, 2018 Filing 112 ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 03/06/2018, re: 45 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike New Arguments Raised in Defendant's Reply in Support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot; 33 Defendant Novelty, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. (sphil, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lifted Limited, LLC v. Novelty Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lifted Limited, LLC
Represented By: Kent Thomas Dallow
Represented By: Brian Patrick O'Donnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novelty Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?