Bridges v. Fernandez et al
John Clark Bridges |
C. Fernandez, Behle and Lynch |
1:2016cv03206 |
December 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Gordon P. Gallagher |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 ORDER granting 122 Motion to Dismiss; granting 123 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 137 Report and Recommendations. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 11/16/18. (jdyne, ) |
Filing 137 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 8/21/18 re 123 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Jack Fox, and 122 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by J . Lynch, D. Behle, C. Fernandez. This Court RECOMMENDS that Defendants Fernandez, Behle, and Lynchs Motion to Dismiss [ECF. #122] be GRANTED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and the claims against them be dismissed without prejudice. The Court further RECOMMENDS that Defendant Foxs Motion to Dismiss [ECF. #123] be GRANTED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and the claim against him be dismissed without prejudice. (nmarb, ) |
Filing 53 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Status Conference held on 6/12/2017. Denying 40 Motion for TRO. Denying 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Denying 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Denying 35 Motion for Trial. Denying 36 Motion for Issuance. FTR: Courtroom A-402. (amont, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.