Lewis v. Kenneth William Lewis, a private trust
Kenneth William Lewis |
Kenneth William Lewis, a private trust |
1:2016mc00027 |
February 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
El Paso |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Kenneth William Lewis, a private trust and against Kenneth William Lewis re: 10 Order Dismissing Case, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 03/15/16. (nmarb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lewis v. Kenneth William Lewis, a private trust | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kenneth William Lewis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kenneth William Lewis, a private trust | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.