Deasy v. Optimal Home Care, Inc,
Michael Deasy |
Optimal Home Care, Inc |
1:2017cv00287 |
January 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 0207 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Attorney Fees by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/19/19.(dkals, ) |
Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 79 Motion for Damages AND 80 Motion for post judgment interest by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/4/19. (pglov) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Deasy v. Optimal Home Care, Inc, | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Deasy | |
Represented By: | Richard P. Barkley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Optimal Home Care, Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.