Deasy v. Optimal Home Care, Inc,
Plaintiff: Michael Deasy
Defendant: Optimal Home Care, Inc
Case Number: 1:2017cv00287
Filed: January 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0207
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion for Attorney Fees by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/19/19.(dkals, )
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 79 Motion for Damages AND 80 Motion for post judgment interest by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/4/19. (pglov)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deasy v. Optimal Home Care, Inc,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Deasy
Represented By: Richard P. Barkley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optimal Home Care, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?