Emericare, Inc. et al v. Calvin
| Emericare, Inc., Emerical, Inc., Emericare Countryside Village, LLC, Emeritus Corporation, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., Watermark Harvard Square, LLC, Watermark Harvard Square AP, LLC, Watermark Harvard Square Owner, LLC, Watermark Retirement Communities, Inc., Watermark Services I, LLC and Watermark Services, IV, LLC |
| Willie Lee Calvin |
| 1:2017cv00446 |
| February 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Raymond P. Moore |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 4 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/6/2018. This court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs 1 petition to compel arbitration be GRANTED; Defendant be ENJOINED from further pursuing the underlying Denver District Court action: Calvin v. Watermark Order, 2016-CV-34673; The federal case be stayed; The court direct the Clerk of the Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the case pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, pending completion of arbitration pursuant to the Parties Arbitration Agreement; and the court, following any final order of arbitration, permit the Parties to move to re-open the case upon good cause, including to enforce the arbitration award. (jgonz, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
