Supreme Cable Technology, Inc. v. InLand Technologies Holdings, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Supreme Cable Technology, Inc.
Defendant: InLand Technologies Holdings, LLC, Durham Commercial Capital Corporation and Rick Schmidt
Case Number: 1:2017cv00457
Filed: February 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Scott T. Varholak
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MINUTE ENTRY for Status Conference held before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 2/28/2017; 12 Plaintiffs Request for a Hearing or Ruling on Plaintiffs Pending Noticeof Discovery Dispute, Regarding January 26, 2017 Order CompellingDisclosu re is GRANTED. 13 Defendants Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 26(c) is DENIED as moot. 19 Defendants Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint is DENIED as moot. 20 Defendants Second and Final Motion for Extension o f Time to Respond to Complaint is DENIED as moot. 22 Defendants Forthwith Motion to Modify the Protective Order or in theAlternative for Leave to Designate Certain Materials Attorneys EyesOnly shall remain pending. The Clerk of Court shall remove t he restriction level of the motion. 23 Plaintiffs Notice of Discovery Dispute, Regarding January 26, 2017 Order Compelling Disclosure is DENIED without prejudice. 25 Motion for Leave to Restrict is GRANTED. 26 shall remain under Level 1 Restriction. Status Conference set for 4/7/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Hearing concluded. FTR: STV - C205. (morti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Supreme Cable Technology, Inc. v. InLand Technologies Holdings, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Supreme Cable Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Leigh Holland Singleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: InLand Technologies Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Douglas W. Lambalot
Represented By: Theodore Wells Rosen
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Durham Commercial Capital Corporation
Represented By: Douglas W. Lambalot
Represented By: Theodore Wells Rosen
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rick Schmidt
Represented By: Douglas W. Lambalot
Represented By: Theodore Wells Rosen
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson
Represented By: Douglas W. Lambalot
Represented By: Theodore Wells Rosen
Represented By: Lauren Elizabeth Mosse Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?