Blackwell v. Hansen et al
| Lamar Atu Blackwell |
| Matthew Hansen and Attorney General of the State of Coloardo, The |
| 1:2017cv00625 |
| March 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. ORDERED: The Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 , filed by Applicant, Lamar Atu Blackwell, on March 9, 2017, is DENIED. The Application is DISMISSED WITH PREJUD ICE. It is FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. Governing Section 2254 Cases 11(a); S lack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-85 (2000). FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Applicant files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P.24, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/26/2017. (dhans, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
