Hardy et al v. Flood et al
| Steven Hardy and Jody Whitson-Hardy |
| Mervin J. Flood and Susan S. Flood |
| 1:2017cv00677 |
| March 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Douglas |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER Granting 136 Defendants' Motion in Limine. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 1, evidence relating to basement permit status shall be EXCLUDED from trial. That, with respect to Defendants ' Motion in Limine No. 2, Mr. Stein's opinions regarding basement permit status and, in particular, that "it is not reasonable to expect a buyer, even if they had seen and read the parcel search to have noticed, or been concerned ab out, the 'Finished Bsmt. Sq. Ft.: 0' notation in the document" shall be EXCLUDED from trial. That, with respect to Defendants' Motion in Limine No. 3, any and all evidence relating to why Defendants did not obtain a permit when finishing their basement in 2007 or 2008 and whether the Defendants discussed whether they should obtain a permit in the basement shall be EXCLUDED from trial, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/11/2019.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER. Defendants' Motion in Limine (Doc. # 136 ) is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Defendants' Fourth Motion in Limine is GRANTED and the Court reserves its ruling on Defendants' First, Second, and Third Motions in Limine. Pla intiffs' Motion to Allow Trial Testimony By Telephone of Witness Edwin "Happy" Broussard (Doc. # 137 ) is DENIED. Authorization is granted for the parties to retake the deposition of Edwin "Happy" Broussard. The Trial Preparation Conference set for 05/15/2019, is VACATED, and RESET to 10/23/2019, at at 03:00 PM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Christine M. Arguello. In lieu thereof, the parties are directed to attend an in-person Status Conference on 5/15/2019, at 03:00 PM. The five-day Jury Trial set to commence on 5/20/2019, is VACATED and RESET to 11/4/2019, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 602 before Judge Christine M. Arguello. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 05/10/2019. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER Denying Defendants' 108 Motion for Summary Judgment. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 02/26/2019. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER Denying Defendants' 65 Motion for Costs and Attorneys' Fees. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 02/21/2019. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
107
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re denying 78 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint filed by Susan S. Flood, Mervin J. Flood, by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10/22/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3, # 3 Part 4) (slibi, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Rejecting the 62 February 2, 2018 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 35 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are accordingly dismissed without prejudice. Shoul d Plaintiffs wish to file a Second Amended Complaint specifically addressing the pleading deficiencies identified in this Order, it shall be filed no later than 3/23/2018, or this case will be dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 02/23/2018. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
62
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re denying 35 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/02/2018. (slibi, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
