Anza Technology, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.

Plaintiff: Anza Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv00687
Filed: March 17, 2017
Court: Colorado District Court
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William J. Martinez
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:0101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 27, 2017 48 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting 31 Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Clerk shall transmit the file to the Clerk of that court. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/27/2017. (angar, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anza Technology, Inc. v. Xilinx, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anza Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Anton Nasri Handal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xilinx, Inc.
Represented By: Scott F. Llewellyn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?