Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC
Kim Mitcham |
Americold Logistics, LLC |
1:2017cv00808 |
March 31, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Jefferson |
William J. Martinez |
Nina Y. Wang |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/20/2017. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's 36 Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (nywlc2, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mitcham v. Americold Logistics, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Americold Logistics, LLC | |
Represented By: | Dion York Kohler |
Represented By: | Melisa Hallie Panagakos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kim Mitcham | |
Represented By: | John Robert Olsen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.