Peterson v. Nelnet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Andrew Peterson
Defendant: Nelnet, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2017cv01064
Filed: April 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Nina Y. Wang
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 251 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/10/2022. IT IS ORDERED that: Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement Agreement 247 is GRANTED; The Parties' proposed Settl ement Agreement [Doc. 247-1 at 2641] is APPROVED; Plaintiff Jeff Peterson, personal representative of the Estate of Andrew Peterson, is AWARDED a service award for serving as the class representative in the amount of $6,000; The 29 Opt-In Plaint iffs identified by the Parties, see [Doc. 247-1 at 30-31], each are AWARDED a service award for participating in discovery in the amount of $100; Plaintiffs' counsel are awarded attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $1,600,00 0; The Parties and Settlement Administrator are DIRECTED to proceed with administration of the settlement checks, as set forth in the Settlement Agreement; The Court SHALL RETAIN jurisdiction over the interpretation and implementation of the Settlement Agreement; and The Clerk of the Court SHALL TERMINATE the case. The parties shall bear their own costs except as provided above. (alave, )
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 189 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 186 by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/3/2019. Plaintiff Andrew Peterson's Motion for Summary Judgment 158 is DENIED; Defendant Nelnet's Motion for Summary Judgment 168 is GRANTED; Defendant Nel net's Decertification Motion 171 is DENIED AS MOOT; The court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under § 1367(c)(3); Plaintiff's state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; The Clerk of the Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant Nelnet Diversified Solutions, LLC; and Defendant, as the prevailing party, shall be awarded its costs pursuant to Rule 54(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. (bwilk, )
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 186 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/23/19 DENYING 158 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; GRANTING 168 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING as moot 171 Motion for Order of Decertification. The court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under § 1367(c)(3); this case is REMANDED to Denver District Court; the Clerk of the Court is directed to TRANSMIT this case to the appropriate state authority.(nmarb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. Nelnet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Peterson
Represented By: Brian David Gonzales
Represented By: Michael J. Palitz
Represented By: Gregg I. Shavitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nelnet, Inc.
Represented By: Richard B. Benenson
Represented By: Martine Tariot Wells
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?