Helm v. Foster
Petitioner: Lee Helm
Respondent: Sean Foster
Case Number: 1:2017cv01123
Filed: May 5, 2017
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Crowley
Presiding Judge: Gordon P. Gallagher
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: The Third Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 16 is denied as moot and this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. There is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/30/2019. (ebuch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helm v. Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lee Helm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Sean Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?