Wirs v. United World Wrestling

Wirs v. United World Wrestling

Plaintiff:	Peter J. Wirs
Defendant:	United World Wrestling
Case Number:	1:2017cv01627
Filed:	July 5, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office:	Denver Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Scott T. Varholak
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 0014
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 4, 2018	Filing 66 ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's March 27, 2018 Recommendation and Denying Summary Judgment & Order to Show Cause why this Action should not be Dismissed without prejudice for Failure to Serve Process. Judge Varholak's March 27, 2018 Reco mmendation (ECF No. 61 ) is ADOPTED IN PART and VACATED AS MOOT IN PART, as stated in this Order. Wirs's Omnibus Motion (ECF No. 53 ) is DENIED. Wirs is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before September 12, 2018, why this lawsuit should not be d ismissed without prejudice for failure to serve the defendant within the time allotted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m); and The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Wirs at his address on file, by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/4/2018. (angar, )
February 2, 2018	Filing 59 ORDER ON PENDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND "EMERGENCY MOTION" by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/2/18. 10 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Consolidation of Hearing with Trial on Merits, and for Summay [sic] Judgme nt on Antitrust Liability is denied. 17 Report and Recommendations is vacated as moot. 18 Second Omnibus Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Stay of Recommendations, Leave to Amend Complaint, and Motion to Set Down Settlement Conference is denied. 20 Report and Recommendations is adopted in part and vacated in part. 21 Emergency Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Set Down Settlement Conference Denied By By [sic] Operation of Law is denied. 24 Third Omnibus Motion is denied. 29 Report and Recommendations is vacated as moot. 31 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Upon Approval of Settlement is denied. 34 Report and Recommendations is adopted in part and vacated in part. (dkals, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 4, 2018

Filing 66 ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's March 27, 2018 Recommendation and Denying Summary Judgment & Order to Show Cause why this Action should not be Dismissed without prejudice for Failure to Serve Process. Judge Varholak's March 27, 2018 Reco mmendation (ECF No. 61 ) is ADOPTED IN PART and VACATED AS MOOT IN PART, as stated in this Order. Wirs's Omnibus Motion (ECF No. 53 ) is DENIED. Wirs is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, on or before September 12, 2018, why this lawsuit should not be d ismissed without prejudice for failure to serve the defendant within the time allotted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m); and The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to Wirs at his address on file, by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/4/2018. (angar, )

February 2, 2018

Filing 59 ORDER ON PENDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND "EMERGENCY MOTION" by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/2/18. 10 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction, Consolidation of Hearing with Trial on Merits, and for Summay [sic] Judgme nt on Antitrust Liability is denied. 17 Report and Recommendations is vacated as moot. 18 Second Omnibus Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Stay of Recommendations, Leave to Amend Complaint, and Motion to Set Down Settlement Conference is denied. 20 Report and Recommendations is adopted in part and vacated in part. 21 Emergency Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Set Down Settlement Conference Denied By By [sic] Operation of Law is denied. 24 Third Omnibus Motion is denied. 29 Report and Recommendations is vacated as moot. 31 Motion to Dismiss Complaint Upon Approval of Settlement is denied. 34 Report and Recommendations is adopted in part and vacated in part. (dkals, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wirs v. United World Wrestling
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter J. Wirs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United World Wrestling
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?