Kiley v. Jeffco Public Schools et al
| Michael Kiley |
| Jeffco Public Schools, Josephine Gallagher, R. Craig Hess, Christopher Esser, Josephine (I) Gallagher, Christopher (I) Esser and R. (I) Craig Hess |
| 1:2017cv01783 |
| July 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Nina Y. Wang |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 33 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's complaint based on failure to timely file suit is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Josephine Gallagher as an individual defendant is GRANTED. Defendant Josephine Gallagher, in her official capacity, is dismissed as a named defendant. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 02/12/2018. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
27
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/12/2017. This court respectfully RECOMMENDS that: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 21 be GRANTED; the Clerk of the Court accept [#21-2] for filing, file it on the docket as a separate entry, and amend the caption to reflect the remaining Defendants in this matter; and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 24 by DENIED as moot. (nywlc2, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
