Thiess v. City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado et al
| Derek A. Thiess |
| City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Moncia Duran, Janice Hoppe, Kristi Davis, Zackary Urban, Zackary (I) Urban, Tim Fitzgerald, George Pond, III, Larry Mathews, Genevieve Wooden, Kenneth Johnstone, Kenneth (I) Johnstone, Patrick Goff, John Schumacher, John (I) Schumacher, Donna Schneider, Donna (I) Schneider and Joyce Jay |
| 1:2017cv02261 |
| September 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Jefferson |
| Kristen L. Mix |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER. Defendants' Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (#83) 85 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's first, second, third, and fourth claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's fif th, sixth, and seventh claims are dismissed without prejudice. Within 14 days of the entry of this order, defendants may have their costs by filing a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of the Court. This case is closed, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/19/19.(sgrim)
|
|
Filing
52
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/22/18 re 49 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Jury Demand. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Motion [#49] be GRANTED and that the Amended Complaint [49-1] be accepted for filing. (lgale, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
