Abdulmutallab v. Sessions et al
| Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab |
| Jefferson Sessions and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2017cv02493 |
| October 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER granting in part and denying as moot in part 79 Motion to Dismiss, adopting 121 Report and Recommendations, dismissing remaining claims, and overruling 129 Objection to Recommendation. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Entered by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/18/2019. (cpear)
|
|
Filing
121
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 79 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jefferson Sessions by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/6/2019. RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint 76 beGRANTED in part, that Claims 7, 11, 12, and 13 be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and that Claims 2, 3, 4, 5, and 14 be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). The court further RECOMMENDS that the motion be DENIED in part as moot as to Claims 1 and 6, which this court does not address in this Recommendation based on its previous Recommendation (Doc. No. 120 ) that Defendants be granted summary judgment on those claims for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. (tsher, )
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER that "Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judges Order (Doc. 102) Denying Plaintiffs Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) Motion (Doc. 90 )" (ECF No. 109 ) is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part as stated herein; the Magistrate Judges Order of June 27, 2018 (ECF No. 102 ) is ACCEPTED and AFFIRMED as to the finding that discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) may not be had, but REJECTED as to the finding "that the reason the discovery is being sought is likely to satisfy the Plaintiff 's speculative hope of finding some evidence that might tend to support another complaint and is therefore improper."; and, the 110 OBJECTION/Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court is DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/24/2018. (cthom, )
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER Overruling Plaintiff's 49 Objections to Magistrate Judge's 42 Order Granting Defendants 20 Motion to Stay Discovery. The Magistrate Judge's 42 Order is AFFIRMED and the discovery in this action is STAYED pending resolution of the 79 Motion to Dismiss and 80 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, unless otherwise ordered. ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 7/9/2018. (cthom, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
