Barrett-Taylor v. ADT Security Services
Plaintiff: Dorothy Barrett-Taylor
Defendant: ADT Security Services
Case Number: 1:2017cv02577
Filed: October 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Archuleta
Presiding Judge: Gordon P. Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER denying 116 Motion to Reopen Case; granting 126 Motion to Enforce Settlement; denying 129 Motion to Reset by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/25/21.(jdyne, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barrett-Taylor v. ADT Security Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Barrett-Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADT Security Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?