Reneau v. Cardinas et al
Chester Lee Reneau |
Mary Cardinas, Judy Brizendine, Judy (I) Brizendine, Louis Cabiling, Louis (I) Cabiling, Rick Raemisch and Rick (I) Raemisch |
1:2017cv02595 |
October 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Crowley |
Gordon P. Gallagher |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 217 ORDER accepting 215 Recommendation to Grant Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute. Granting 212 Defendant Mary Cardinas' Motion to Dismiss, with Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute. This case is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/27/2023. (ebuch) |
Filing 167 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/29/2020, re: 114 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 117 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 143 the Recommendation of United States Magistrat e Judge is ACCEPTED in part and REJECTED in part. ORDERED that this case shall remain open for the limited purpose of ruling on the outstanding Motion for Sanctions [Docket No. 150].(sphil, ) Modified on 5/29/2020 to edit text. (sphil, ). |
Filing 166 ORDER DENYING 160 Motion for Recusal. The Motion is DENIED for the reasons stated in the attached order. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/14/2020. (skclc2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.