Cunningham Lindsey U.S. Inc. v. Crawford & Company et al
| Cunningham Lindsey U.S. Inc. |
| Crawford & Company, Robert Williams, William Walls, Thomas Walls, Ryan Walls and Andrew Larson |
| 1:2017cv03041 |
| December 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER Affirming and Adopting the 100 December 3, 2018 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Defendant Crawford's Amended Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 71 ) is GRANTED. Claims 6 and 7, which Plaintiff Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc. asserts only against Defendant Crawford, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant Crawford is dismissed as a defendant in this action. Plaintiff's claims against remaining Defendants Robert Williams, Andrew Larson, William Walls, Thomas Walls, and Ryan Walls survive. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/07/2019. (athom, )
|
|
Filing
100
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/3/18 re Amended Motion to Dismiss 71 . The Court respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Motion be GRANTED and Plaintiff's Claims Six and Seven be dismissed without prejudice. (lgale, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
