Session v. Carson et al
Franky L. Session |
Vanessa Carson, Lindsey E. Fish, Teddy L. Laurance, Tejinder Singh, Robert L. Manguso, Timothy R. Brown, Robert Stienbeck, Joelene Gonzales, Ciana Doss, Rick Raemisch, Susan Tiona and Jeff Archambeau |
1:2018cv00239 |
January 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Logan |
Gordon P. Gallagher |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 349 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/15/2022, re: 285 the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to Order and Recommendation 285 by the United States Magistrate Judge 300 , construed as an objection, is OVERRULED. ORDERED that plaintiff's claim against defendant Timothy Brown is DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED that defendant Timothy Brown is DISMISSED. (sphil, ) |
Filing 347 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on June 13, 2022. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Motion 339 be GRANTED and that Claims 8 and 9, the only claims asserted against Defendant Gribble, be DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days after service of this Recommendation to serve and file any written objections in order to obtain reconsideration by the District Judg e to whom this case is assigned. A party's failure to serve and file specific, written objections waives de novo review of the Recommendation by the District Judge, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985), and also waiv es appellate review of both factual and legal questions. Makin v. Colo. Dep't of Corr., 183 F.3d 1205, 1210 (10th Cir. 1999); Talley v. Hesse, 91 F.3d 1411, 1412-13 (10th Cir. 1996). A party's objections to this Recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the District Court or for appellate review. United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). (csarr, ) |
Filing 307 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/5/2021, re: 304 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix is ACCEPTED; 266 Defendant Tejinder Singh's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (sphil, ) |
Filing 285 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/3/2020. Plaintiffs 280 Motion Requesting Both Subpoena Duces Tecum to Be Served by Officers of the Court is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs claim against Defendant Brown be DISMISSED without prejudice and that Defendant Brown be dismissed from thislawsuit. (jgonz, ) |
Filing 192 ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/27/2019, re: 145 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED; 97 plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to Amend Caption, Defendants' Names, and Section B of the Seco nd Amended Complaint for Injunction Relief Only is DENIED in part. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to Magistrate Judge Recommendations [ECF 145] 174 , construed as an objection, is OVERRULED. ORDERED that plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 63] is DENIED in part and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in part, as consistent with this order and the recommendation.(sphil, ) |
Filing 104 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/24/19. Motion Requesting Court Order to Only Allow CD's Holding X-rays and CAT Scans Images to Be Viewed/Scanned in His Presence [ 72] and Motion Requesting Court Order to Return CD's Holding X-rays and CAT Scan Images are DENIED without prejudice. (lgale, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.