July 15, 2022 |
Filing
349
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/15/2022, re: 285 the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to Order and Recommendation 285 by the United States Magistrate Judge 300 , construed as an objection, is OVERRULED. ORDERED that plaintiff's claim against defendant Timothy Brown is DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED that defendant Timothy Brown is DISMISSED. (sphil, )
|
June 13, 2022 |
Filing
347
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on June 13, 2022. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Motion 339 be GRANTED and that Claims 8 and 9, the only claims asserted against Defendant Gribble, be DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days after service of this Recommendation to serve and file any written objections in order to obtain reconsideration by the District Judg e to whom this case is assigned. A party's failure to serve and file specific, written objections waives de novo review of the Recommendation by the District Judge, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985), and also waiv es appellate review of both factual and legal questions. Makin v. Colo. Dep't of Corr., 183 F.3d 1205, 1210 (10th Cir. 1999); Talley v. Hesse, 91 F.3d 1411, 1412-13 (10th Cir. 1996). A party's objections to this Recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the District Court or for appellate review. United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). (csarr, )
|
February 5, 2021 |
Filing
307
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/5/2021, re: 304 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix is ACCEPTED; 266 Defendant Tejinder Singh's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (sphil, )
|
November 3, 2020 |
Filing
285
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/3/2020. Plaintiffs 280 Motion Requesting Both Subpoena Duces Tecum to Be Served by Officers of the Court is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs claim against Defendant Brown be DISMISSED without prejudice and that Defendant Brown be dismissed from thislawsuit. (jgonz, )
|
September 27, 2019 |
Filing
192
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/27/2019, re: 145 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED; 97 plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to Amend Caption, Defendants' Names, and Section B of the Seco nd Amended Complaint for Injunction Relief Only is DENIED in part. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to Magistrate Judge Recommendations [ECF 145] 174 , construed as an objection, is OVERRULED. ORDERED that plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 63] is DENIED in part and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in part, as consistent with this order and the recommendation.(sphil, )
|
January 24, 2019 |
Filing
104
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/24/19. Motion Requesting Court Order to Only Allow CD's Holding X-rays and CAT Scans Images to Be Viewed/Scanned in His Presence [ 72] and Motion Requesting Court Order to Return CD's Holding X-rays and CAT Scan Images are DENIED without prejudice. (lgale, )
|