Vreeland v. Huss
| Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II |
| Robert Charles Huss |
| 1:2018cv00303 |
| February 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
247
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/21/2022, re: 215 the portion of the Order and Recommendation re: Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing/Conference of Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews, recommending administrative closure is REJECTED. ORDERED that Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Hearing/Conference [Docket No. 219] is GRANTED. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation [Docket No. 222] is DENIED.. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
215
ORDER denying 200 Motion for Hearing/Conference. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion as it relates to a request for hearing [#200] and RECOMMENDS the file be administratively closed pending a showing of good cause. Issued by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 8-10-2021. (skclc2).
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/29/2021, re: 181 the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews Re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is ACCEPTED. ORDERED that Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 185] is OVERRULED. ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 133] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion For Enlargement Of Time To Respond To Defendant's 3/1/2021 Objection Which Has Still Not Been Served To Plaintiff By Defendants Counsel [Docket No. 187] is DENIED AS MOOT. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/27/2021, re: 156 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews is ACCPETED; 149 Defendant's Emergency Motion for Hearing and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 65 Injunction is DENIED AS MOOT. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/4/2020. ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Conclusion of Appeal [Docket No. 157 ] is DENIED. ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Actual Ruling on 157 Motion to Stay Pending Conclusion of Appeal [Docket No. 163 ] is DENIED as moot.(rvill, )
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/19/2020, re: 86 plaintiff's Motion for an Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 is DENIED; 127 the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews dated June 24, 2020 is ACCEPTED; 142 plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Order is OVERRULED. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/10/2020, re: plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Order Doc. 73 82 is OVERRULED; 121 that plaintiff's Motion... to Overrule Magistrate Order ECF 118 andto Reassign the Case to a Different Magistrate 121 , construed as anobjection, is OVERRULED. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER DENYING 86 Motion for Order; and 97 Motion for Hearing/Conference. For these reasons stated in the attached order, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for an Order Pursuant Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 [# 86 ] and Motion for Immediate Hearing on Doc. No. 86 [# 97 ] are DENIED. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 6/24/2020. Text Only Entry (skclc2)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/31/2020, re: 78 plaintiff's Motion to Recuse Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer is DENIED; 92 plaintiff's Motion for Immediate Ruling on Motion to Recuse Doc. No. 78 is DENIED AS MOOT.(sphil, )
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER DENYING 62 Motion for Order to Sanction Attorney William Allen. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/29/2020. (skclc2)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER DENYING 69 Motion for Immediate Reassignment and Change of Venue. The Motion is DENIED. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 10/2/2019. (skclc2)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/24/2019, re: 36 defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT; 53 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ORDERED that plaintiff is ordered to file a new version of the Amended Complaint [Docket No. 53-1], omitting the claims excluded by this order and not including additional material regarding the claim for First Amendment retaliation against defendant Robert Huss.(sphil, ).
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/27/2018, re: 27 The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ACCPETED; 12 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall accept plaintiff's amended prisoner complaint [Docket No. 12-1] as filed. (sphil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vreeland v. Huss | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Delmart E.J.M. Vreeland, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Charles Huss | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
