Brayman v. Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc.
| Rachel Brayman |
| Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00550 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William J. Martinez |
| Michael J. Watanabe |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0207 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
413
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. KeyPoint's Motion to Clarify the Court's Order Denying its Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 301 ) is DENIED AS MOOT; 2. KeyPoint's Amended Motion for Decertification (ECF N o. 353 ) is DENIED; 3. Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Final Certification of the FLSA Collective (ECF No. 356 ) is GRANTED; 4. The Court CERTIFIES a FLSA Collective Action class defined as follows: All persons who worked as, or who were hired to be, a Field Investigator, Background Investigator, or in other position with similar job duties, for Defendant KeyPoint Government Solutions, Inc. at any time from April 6, 2015 to September 18, 2019. 5. Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Rule 23 Class Certification (ECF No. 355 ) is DENIED; and 3 The Court presumes familiarity with the February 4, 2021 Order. (ECF No. 294 .) 6. Counsel shall jointly contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by no later than April 22, 2024 to set a status conference or such other proceeding as Judge Neureiter deems appropriate to move this action forward. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 04/17/2024. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing
412
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KEYPOINT GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF CALIFORNIA STATE LAW CLAIMS AND STRIKE RELATED RULE 23 CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS. The Court ORDERS that KeyPoint's Motion to Compel Arbitration of California State Law Claims and Strike Related Rule 23 Class Action Allegations (ECF No. 278 ) is GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS the 31 California Plaintiffs who signed arbitration agreements to arbitrate their claims, consistent with the Arbitrator Decides Clause. The Court further STRIKES all allegations in the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 271 ) relating to the 31 California Plaintiffs who signed arbitration agreements. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 04/12/2024. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing
373
ORDER denying 371 Defendant KeyPoint Government Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/14/2022.(wjmlc2)
|
|
Filing
365
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS. KeyPoint's Motion to Clarify the Court's Order Denying its Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 301 ) is GRANTED IN PART to the extent it seeks clarification of the Court's February 4, 2021 Order and DENIED in all other respects. KeyPoint's Amended Motion for Decertification (ECF No. 353 ) is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Final Certification of the FLSA Collective (ECF No. 356 ) is GRANTED. The Court CERTIFIES a FLSA Collective A ction class as defined herein. Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Rule 23 Class Certification (ECF No. 355 ) is GRANTED. The Court CERTIFIES a Rule 23 Class with the definition stated herein. Plaintiffs Dana McCarthy and Adriana Ponce are hereby APPROVED as Rule 23 class representatives. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g), the Court APPOINTS Nichols Kaster, PLLP as class counsel. Plaintiffs shall file a revised proposed Rule 23 class notice on or before April 22, 202 2. On or before April 29, 2022, the parties shall confer and file a joint statement regarding a proposed schedule for dissemination of the notice of the Rule 23 class in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2). SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/31/2022.(trvo, )
|
|
Filing
294
ORDER Denying Defendant Keypoint Government Solutions, Inc.s 278 Motion to Compel Arbitration of California State Law Claims and Strike Related Rule 23 Class Action Allegations. ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/4/2021.(angar, )
|
|
Filing
270
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part Magistrate Judge's March 17, 2020 Recommendation 256 ; granting Plaintiff's Opposed Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint to Add Party and Claims 222 ; and striking that portion of Defendant's Objection 258 titled "Motion to Compel Arbitration," by Judge William J. Martinez on 07/07/2020. (wjmlc1)
|
|
Filing
217
ORDER granting 157 Joint Motion for Clarification of Scope of Notice List; and granting 198 Motion to Enforce Court Order, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/16/2019. (wjmlc1)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER: KeyPoint's Motion for Reconsideration, or in the Alternative, Certification of an Interlocutory Appeal 73 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the notices of consent to join from persons subject to an arbitration agreement are STRICKE N, and KeyPoint's eight motions to compel arbitration ( 84 , 93 , 106 , 110 , 124 , 128 , 129 , 130 ) are therefore DENIED AS MOOT; and Brayman's Motion for Equitable Tolling 72 is GRANTED. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 08/07/2019. (wjmlc1)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/01/2018, re: 64 Defendant's Motion to Strike is DENIED; 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice is GRANTED IN PART as to conditional certification, as se t forth above. Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to approval of the form of notice submitted at ECF No. 22-2. The parties should attempt to stipulate to a notice and file a joint motion to approve a notice and consent to join form no later than November 16, 2018. Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART as to conditional certification, as set forth above. (sphil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
