Wright Medical Technology, Inc. v. Paragon 28, Inc.
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc. |
| Paragon 28, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv00691 |
| March 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Scott T. Varholak |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
281
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/30/2020, re: 148 parties' Joint Motion for Determination is GRANTED. ORDERED that the disputed claim terms will be construed as indicated above.(sphil, )
|
|
Filing
177
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/30/2019, re: 112 Motion to Dismiss Paragon's Motion to Dismiss Counts Eleven Through Seventeen of the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in this order. ORDERED that Wright's eleventh and twelfth claims are DISMISSED insofar as they are based on allegations that non-founder employees misappropriated trade secrets, with the exception of the allegations as to Gordon in Docket No. 89 at 22-26, 81, 88-93. ORDERED that Wright's thirteenth and fourteenth claims are DISMISSED to the extent that they are based on the failure to disclose the KOLs' equity shares or the filing of the 391 application. ORDERED that Wright's sixteenth and seventeenth claims are DISMISSED. ORDERED that, within fourteen days of this order, Paragon shall file its answer..(sphil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
