Clark v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
| Ted V. Clark |
| Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. a foreign corporation doing business as The Home Depot Store #1513 |
| 1:2018cv00899 |
| April 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Mesa |
| Michael J Watanabe |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference and Setting Deadline for Filing of Consent/Non-Consent Form, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/17/2018. Consent/Non-Consent Form due on or before 6/5/2018. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 6/19/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. (slibi, )
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Home Depot,USA, Inc (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6056417), filed by TED V CLARK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dean, Dorothy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND by Plaintiff TED V CLARK (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dean, Dorothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
