Gilbert v. Lopez
| Heidi Gilbert, Amber Means, Mandy Meloon and Gabriela Joslin |
| Jean Lopez, United States Olympic Committee, United States Taekwondo Association and Steven Lopez |
| 1:2018cv00981 |
| April 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Christine M. Arguello |
| Michael E. Hegarty |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0051 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
423
ORDER Denying 372 Defendant Steven Lopez's Motion for Summary Judgment, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/21/2021.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
404
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 351 Markels Motion to Intervene and Lift Stay. Markel's request to intervene is GRANTED, and Markel's Complaint in Intervention (Doc. # 351-1) is ACCEPTED AS FILED as of the date of this Order. Markel's request to lift the stay is DENIED AS MOOT, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/25/2021.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
318
Withdrawn - RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/29/2020. I respectfully RECOMMEND that Judge Arguello GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Defendant USAT's Motions to Dismiss [filed February 21, 2020; ECF 294 ] as follows: dismiss Claim 9; Claim 10; Claim 11; and Claim 12, and permit (in addition to Claims 1, 4, 6, and 7) Claim 2; Claim 3; Claim 5; and Claim 8 to proceed. (apesa, ) Modified on 5/29/2020 (apesa, ).
|
|
Filing
292
ORDER granting 281 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/30/2020.(tsher, )
|
|
Filing
266
ORDER, The March 6, 2019 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty (Doc. # 218 ) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART; The Lopez Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 106 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Defendant USOC's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Class Action Allegations (Doc. # 108 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Defendant USAT's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 109 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN P ART; The following claims are DISMISSED: Claim 14: All Plaintiffs' claim of obstruction, attempted obstruction, and interference with enforcement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1590(b), 1591(d), 1595(a), and 2255, against Defendant U SOC; Claim 15: All Plaintiffs claim of violation of RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), against all Defendants; Claim 16: All Plaintiffs' claim of negligent supervision against the Institutional Defendants; Claim 17: All Plaintiffs' claim o f negligent retention against the Institutional Defendants; Claim 19: All Plaintiffs' claim of negligence against the Institutional Defendants and SafeSport; Claim 20: All Plaintiffs' claim of gross negligence against the Institutional Defendants and SafeSport; and Claim 21: All Plaintiffs' claim of outrageous conduct against Defendant USOC and SafeSport. Plaintiffs' proposed Damages Class is STRICKEN; Defendant Jean Edwards is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this actio n; The following claims survive Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, to the extent that the alleged conduct took place within the applicable statute of limitations, as described above: Claim 1: Plaintiff Meloon's claim of forced labor, in vi olation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1589(a), 1595(a), and 2255, against Defendant Steven Lopez; Claim 4: Plaintiff Joslins claim of forced labor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1589(b) and 1595(a), against Defendant USAT; Claim 5: Plaintiff Joslin's claim of trafficking with respect to forced labor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1590(a) and 1595(a), against Defendant Steven Lopez and Defendant USAT; Claim 8: Plaintiff Means's claim of forced labor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1589(a), 1595(a), and 2255, against Defendant Steven Lopez; Claim 9: Plaintiff Means's claim of forced labor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1589(b) and 1595(a), against the Institutional Defendants; Claim 10: Plaintiff Means's claim of trafficking with respect to forced labor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1590(a), 1595(a), and 2255, against Defendant Steven Lopez; Claim 13: Plaintiff Meanss claim of sexual exploitation, transportation, a nd illegal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2242, 2421, 2422, 2423(a)(c), and 2255, against Defendant Steven Lopez; Claim 14: All Plaintiffs claim of obstruction, attempted obstruction, and interference with enforcement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1590(b), 1591(d), 1595(a), and 2255, against Defendant USAT, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/27/2019.(evana, )
|
|
Filing
218
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 109 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Class Action Complaint filed by USA Taekwondo, Inc., 106 Second MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Jean Lopez, S teven Lopez, 108 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Motion to Strike Under F.R.C.P. 12(f) Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint filed by United States Olympic Committee by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/6/2019. (tsher, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
