Phan v. Hammersmith Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kent Vu Phan
Defendant: Hammersmith Management, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01351
Filed: June 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Gordon P. Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER adopting 45 Report and Recommendations; granting 19 Motion to (partially) Dismiss by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 7/16/19.(jdyne, )
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 45 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Hammersmith Management, Inc., by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/3/2019. (tsher, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phan v. Hammersmith Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kent Vu Phan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hammersmith Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?