Paulsen v. Hickenlooper et al
| Mark Walter Paulsen |
| John W. Hickenlooper, John (I) W. Hickenlooper, Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch, Mathew Hansen, Mathew (I) Hansen, Helene Christner, Helene (I) Christner, Anthony A. DeCesaro, Anthony (I) A. DeCesaro, Gary Ward, Gary (I) Ward, May Ryder, May (I) Ryder, Nicole Wilson, Nicole (I) Wilson and CDOC Infectious Disease Committee |
| 1:2018cv01396 |
| June 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Gordon P. Gallagher |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/21/2021, re: 154 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate is ACCEPTED; 131 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. ORDERED that any claim other than the denial of plaintiff's chronic care status and the failure to address his blood test results is DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED that plaintiff's claim based on denial of his chronic care status and failure to address blood test results is DISMISSED with prejudice. ORDERED that this case is closed.. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/27/2019, re: 68 the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED; 80 Plaintiff's Objection to Dismiss Defendants, Hickenlooper Raemish, Hansen, Christner, [Docket No. 80], which the Court construes as an objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation [Docket No. 68], is OVERRULED; 42 defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 55 Plaintiff's Motion Re questing Injunction is DENIED as moot. ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Hickenlooper, Raemisch, and Hansen in their individual capacities are DISMISSED with prejudice ORDERED that, to the extent pla intiff's Motion Addressing the Plaintiffs "Transfer Under the Colorado Uniform Custodial Trust Act" and Addressing the Court to Recuse Themselves from Case 18-cv-01396-PAB-KMT can be construed as an objection to the magistrate judges o rder, Docket No. 77, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), plaintiff's objection is OVERRULED. The remaining portion of plaintiff's motion, which appears to request Magistrate Judge Tafoya's recusal from this case, will be referred to the magistrate judge in a separate order. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/26/2019, re: 84 MOTION Addressing the Plaintiff's "Transfer Under the Colorado Uniform custodial Trust Act" and Addressing the Court To Recuse themselves from case is DENIED. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/16/2019, re: 31 Motion for Reconsideration. ORDERED that plaintiff's Objection to Defendant's Dismissals [Docket No. 31] and Supplemental Response to Plaintiff's Objection to Dismiss Defendants [Docket No. 36], which the Court construes as a motion to reconsider Judge Babcock's October 12, 2018 order of partial dismissal, Docket No. 26, is DENIED. (sphil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
