Brito v. El Zarco, LLC et al
Carlos Brito |
El Zarco LLC, PHO 50, LTD and CUAUTLA, INC. |
1:2018cv01555 |
June 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
El Paso |
Kathleen M. Tafoya |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER Vacating Default Judgment Against Defendants El Zarco, LLC and Cuautla, Inc. The Court's October 2, 2018 Order Entering Default Judgment Against Defendants El Zarco and Cuaulta (Doc. # 35 ) and its entry of final judgment against them (Doc. # 36 ) are VACATED; Defendants El Zarco and Cuaulta's Motion to Vacate the Clerks Entry of Default (Doc. # 33 ) is GRANTED; The Clerk's Entry of Default as to Defendants El Zarco and Cuaulta (Doc. # 10 ) is VACATED; and Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant El Zarco and Cuaulta (Doc. # 15 ) is DENIED AS MOOT, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/9/2018. (evana, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER Entering Default Judgment Against Defendants El Zarco, LLC and Cuautla, Inc. GRANTING IN PART 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants, El Zarco, LLC and Cuautla, Inc. as to request for declaratory and injunctive re lief; DENYING IN PART 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants, El Zarco and Cuautla, Inc. as to Plaintiff's imprecise request for attorneys' fees and costs. ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/2/2018. (swest) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.