Ceballos v. Arizona Automobile Insurance Company
| Alma Ceballos |
| Arizona Automobile Insurance Company |
| 1:2018cv01773 |
| July 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (rroge, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Arizona Automobile Insurance Company on 6/20/2018 (rroge, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Arizona Automobile Insurance Company, filed by Alma Ceballos.(rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by attorneyTaylor Winslow.The s/signature did not match the filers name on the account for which the login and password are registered. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Arizona Automobile Insurance Company from Denver County District Court, Case Number 2018CV32272. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6193181), filed by Arizona Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - District Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Return of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taylor, Winslow) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ceballos v. Arizona Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alma Ceballos | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Torres |
| Represented By: | DezaRae D. LaCrue |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arizona Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Winslow Russell Taylor, III |
| Represented By: | Justin Hans Zouski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
