Craig Hospital v. Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan et al
| Craig Hospital |
| United HealthCare Services, Inc., Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefit Plan and Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan |
| 1:2018cv01791 |
| July 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Arapahoe |
| Richard P Matsch |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1104 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/27/2018. Text Only Entry (ktera)
|
| Filing 10 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: 9 Notice of Noncompliance with Court Procedures/Rules, filed by attorney R. Craig Ewing. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. (Text Only Entry) (evana, ) |
| Filing 9 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Case filed by attorney R. Craig Ewing. The document is incorrectly formatted. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1 (Text Only Entry) (evana, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case Without Prejudice by Plaintiff Craig Hospital (Ewing, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Douglas Gibson on behalf of Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan, United HealthCare Services, Inc.Attorney Mark Douglas Gibson added to party Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan(pty:dft), Attorney Mark Douglas Gibson added to party United HealthCare Services, Inc.(pty:dft) (Gibson, Mark) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Briana Liston Black on behalf of Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan, United HealthCare Services, Inc. (Black, Briana) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendants United HealthCare Services, Inc., Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan. United HealthCare Services, Inc. answer due 8/27/2018; Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefits Plan answer due 8/27/2018. (Black, Briana) |
| Filing 4 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorneyRobert Craig Ewing.Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(d) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must use the correct format for the signature block on all future documents. (Text Only Entry) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Richard P. Matsch and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baker Hughes Incorporated Welfare Benefit Plan, United HealthCare Services, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6197151)Attorney Robert Craig Ewing added to party Craig Hospital(pty:pla), filed by Craig Hospital. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons Baker Hughes, #2 Summons Proposed Summons United, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ewing, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
