Loya v. City of Brighton
Tania Loya |
City of Brighton |
1:2018cv01808 |
July 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
S Kato Crews |
Marcia S Krieger |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 a |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Tania Loya. (Olson, Sean) |
Filing 13 DOCKETING ERROR Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Tania Loya. (Olson, Sean) (Modified on 9/14/2018 wrong PDF attached)(evana, ). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Timothy Paul Berrier on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Timothy Paul Berrier added to party City of Brighton(pty:dft) (Berrier, Timothy) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Marni Nathan Kloster on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Marni Nathan Kloster added to party City of Brighton(pty:dft) (Kloster, Marni) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Tania Loya. City of Brighton waiver sent on 8/31/2018, answer due 10/30/2018. (Olson, Sean) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against City of Brighton, filed by Tania Loya.(Olson, Sean) |
Filing 8 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews, upon his appointment. All future pleadings should reference Magistrate Judge Crews at the end of the civil action number (such as 15-cv-00001-PAB-SKC). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Magistrate Judge Crews in Courtroom C-204. His chambers are located in Room C-253 of the Byron G. Rogers Courthouse. His telephone number is 303-335-2117. (Text only entry) (agarc, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/2/2018. A Scheduling Conference is set for 9/20/2018 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed order in Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. (bwilk, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 7/18/18. Text Only Entry (pglov) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to:(1) Convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a Scheduling Order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, enter such orders as appropriate to enforce the Scheduling Order, and resolve discovery matters;(2) ADR: Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. Early Neutral Evaluation is approved. On the informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in a settlement conference conducted by the magistrate judge if the parties have engaged in an Early Neutral Evaluation and are unable to afford or otherwise attain private settlement assistance;(3) Hear and determine referred matters in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B). by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/08/2018. Text Only Entry (msklc4, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-01808-MSK. (athom, ) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued. (rroge, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Brighton (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6200827)Attorney Sean Timothy Olson added to party Tania Loya(pty:pla), filed by Tania Loya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olson, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Loya v. City of Brighton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tania Loya | |
Represented By: | Sean Timothy Olson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Brighton | |
Represented By: | Timothy Paul Berrier |
Represented By: | Marni Nathan Kloster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.