Santo v. State of Colorado et al
Guy M. Santo |
Crisanta Duran, State of Colorado, Kevin J. Grantham, Public Employees' Retirement Association of Colorado (PERA), Ron Baker and John W. Hickenlooper |
1:2018cv01809 |
July 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT re: #4 Order of Dismissal by Clerk on 8/22/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER of Dismissal. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/22/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. The Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice as premature, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/17/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rvill, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Guy M. Santo. (rvill, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.