Redman et al v. Auto Brakes, Inc.
Plaintiff: Robin Redman and Daniel Redman
Defendant: Auto Brakes Inc and Auto Brakes, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01814
Filed: July 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Philip A Brimmer
Referring Judge: Kristen L Mix
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2018 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Janet R. Spies added to party Auto Brakes, Inc.(pty:dft) by Auto Brakes, Inc..(Spies, Janet)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 11/19/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/27/2018. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (jgonz, )
August 17, 2018 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Daniel Redman, Robin Redman. Auto Brakes, Inc. waiver sent on 7/19/2018, answer due 9/17/2018. (Landry, Scott)
July 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/26/18. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
July 26, 2018 Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #8 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-01814-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (rkeec)
July 26, 2018 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. (rkeec)
July 19, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (evana, )
July 18, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Auto Brakes, Inc. by Plaintiffs Daniel Redman, Robin Redman. (Landry, Scott)
July 18, 2018 Filing 5 Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint, Better Copy of Exhibit 1 from poor quality original by Plaintiffs Daniel Redman, Robin Redman. (Landry, Scott)
July 17, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued, Summons must be on a court approved form. (rroge, )
July 17, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (rroge, )
July 17, 2018 Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Scott Landry.The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (rroge, )
July 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Auto Brakes Inc (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6201545)Attorney Scott Paul Landry added to party Daniel Redman(pty:pla), Attorney Scott Paul Landry added to party Robin Redman(pty:pla), filed by Daniel Redman, Robin Redman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(Landry, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redman et al v. Auto Brakes, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Redman
Represented By: Scott Paul Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Redman
Represented By: Scott Paul Landry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto Brakes Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auto Brakes, Inc.
Represented By: Janet R. Spies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?