Williams v. InnovAge et al
| Ken Williams |
| InnovAge and Caroline Thomas |
| 1:2018cv01848 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| R Brooke Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER: The Scheduling Conference set October 26, 2018 is vacated and reset for November 16, 2018 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 9/13/18. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kevin Robert Blyskal on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Kevin Robert Blyskal added to party Ken Williams(pty:pla) (Blyskal, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Defendant InnovAge. (Hunt, Joseph) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER: A Scheduling Conference is set for 10/26/2018 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 902 before Judge R. Brooke Jackson. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/15/18. Text Only Entry (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant InnovAge All parties do not consent.. (Hunt, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by InnovAge.(Hunt, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 7/27/18. (rbjsec. )
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Hunt, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-01848-RBJ. (athom, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal, Current State Docket Sheet by Defendant InnovAge (Hunt, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawls of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (rroge, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against InnovAge, Caroline Thomas, filed by Ken Williams.(rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by InnovAge from Denver County District Court, Case Number 2018CV32328. (Filing fee $ 400, Receipt Number 1082-6206882), filed by InnovAge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Hunt, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
