Medina v. Raemisch et al
Delano Medina |
Rick Raemisch and Cynthia H. Coffman |
1:2018cv01912 |
July 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT re: #6 Order of Dismissal by Clerk on 9/6/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER of Dismissal. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 9/6/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE re: #4 Filing Fee Received by Petitioner Delano Medina (angar, ) |
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number COX086190 (angar, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies. If Applicant fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/27/2018. (angar, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Delano Medina. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(rroge, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.