Handoko v. Richardson
Plaintiff: Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko
Defendant: Gregory A. Richardson
Case Number: 1:2018cv02048
Filed: August 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Wiley Y Daniel
Nature of Suit: APA Review/Appeal
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2018 Filing 9 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed in this case on 9/19/2018. Text Only Entry (evana, )
September 19, 2018 Filing 8 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Case filed by attorney Mark R. Barr. The document is incorrectly formatted. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1 (Text Only Entry) (evana, )
September 19, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case Without Prejudice by Plaintiff Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko (Barr, Mark)
August 14, 2018 Filing 6 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint,,, filed by attorney Mark Robert Barr.The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (dbera, )
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN, by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 8/14/2018. (evana, )
August 14, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (dbera, )
August 13, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. Text Only Entry (dbera, )
August 13, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Gregory A. Richardson re #1 Complaint,,, by Plaintiff Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko. (Barr, Mark)
August 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USCIS against Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6243894)Attorney Mark Robert Barr added to party Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko(pty:pla), filed by Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Work Permit Application (June 11, 2015), with receipt notice., #2 Exhibit Work Permit, issued September 29, 2015., #3 Exhibit Work Permit Application (June 7, 2017), with receipt notice., #4 Exhibit USCIS Rejection Notice (June 14, 2017)., #5 Exhibit 2018 Work Permit Denial., #6 Exhibit 2017 Work Permit Denial., #7 Exhibit 2017 Motion to Reconsider Transmittal Page and Receipt Notice., #8 Exhibit USCIS Rejection Notice (October 3, 2017)., #9 Exhibit 2017 Denial of Motion to Reconsider., #10 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Barr, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Handoko v. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Agatha Henny Chenthia Handoko
Represented By: Mark Robert Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory A. Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?