Cuattro, LLC v. Carter et al
Plaintiff: Cuattro, LLC
Defendant: Keith W. Carter, Digital Image Solutions, LLC and Digital Imaging Solution, LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv02111
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: R Brooke Jackson
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2018 Filing 15 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to the notice of dismissal filed in this case on 10/10/18. Text Only Entry (dkals, )
October 10, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Plaintiff Cuattro, LLC (Sanchez, Joseph)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Upon review of #9 Response to Order to Show Cause, filed by Cuattro, LLC, the Order to Show Cause #6 issued by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang is hereby DISCHARGED. By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/30/2018. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO SET SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. The parties are ordered to set an initial scheduling conference in this Court (with Judge Jackson) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 no later than 45 days after the answer, motion to dismiss or other response to the complaint is filed. The parties are directed to jointly contact Chambers by telephone at (303) 844-4694 or by email at Jackson_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov to obtain a scheduling conference date. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 8/30/18. (rbjsec. )
August 30, 2018 Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02111-RBJ. (Text Only Entry) (nmarb, )
August 29, 2018 Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Cuattro, LLC All parties do not consent.. (Sanchez, Joseph)
August 29, 2018 Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #6 by Plaintiff Cuattro, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Kevin Wilson, #2 Exhibit Mississippi LLC Certificate of Formation, #3 Exhibit Missippi 2018 LLC Annual Report for Digital Imaging Solution LLC, #4 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Digital Imaging Solution LLC)(Sanchez, Joseph)
August 23, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cuattro, LLC. Digital Imaging Solution, LLC served on 8/22/2018, answer due 9/12/2018. (Carafelli, Andrew)
August 23, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cuattro, LLC. Keith W. Carter served on 8/22/2018, answer due 9/12/2018. (Carafelli, Andrew)
August 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DISCHARGED-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND SET DEADLINE FOR FILING CONSENT/NONCONSENT FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/21/2018. On or before 9/4/2018, Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction; and Parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form by 9/4/2018. (bwilk, ) Modified on 8/31/2018 to add discharged (bwilk, ).
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, )
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02111-NYW. (athom, )
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, )
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (rroge, )
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6255963)Attorney Joseph Patrick Sanchez added to party Cuattro, LLC(pty:pla), filed by Cuattro, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Coversheet, #2 Proposed Summons Keith Carter, #3 Proposed Summons Digital Imaging Solutions)(Sanchez, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cuattro, LLC v. Carter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cuattro, LLC
Represented By: Joseph Patrick Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith W. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Digital Image Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Digital Imaging Solution, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?