Ley v. Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Charlotte Ley
Defendant: Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2018cv02207
Filed: August 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Marcia S Krieger
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2018 Filing 16 REPLY to Response to #13 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Plaintiff Charlotte Ley. (Cohen, Joseph)
October 25, 2018 Filing 15 MOTION to Enforce Confession of Judgment by Plaintiff Charlotte Ley. (Cohen, Joseph)
October 25, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution fo Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #13) by Defendant Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.. (Mackender, Darin)
October 4, 2018 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) by Defendant Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.. (Mackender, Darin)
October 4, 2018 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Charles Schwab Corporation for Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.. (Mackender, Darin)
October 4, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Darin L. Mackender on behalf of Charles Schwab and Company, Inc. (Mackender, Darin)
September 14, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charlotte Ley. Charles Schwab and Company, Inc. served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Cohen, Joseph)
September 13, 2018 Filing 9 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (dkals, )
September 12, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Charles Schwab and Company, Inc. re #2 Complaint, by Plaintiff Charlotte Ley. (Cohen, Joseph)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 11/1/2018 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/30/2018. (jgonz, )
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/30/18. Text Only Entry (pglov)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak: IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a) and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to:(1)Convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a Scheduling Order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, enter such orders as appropriate to enforce the Scheduling Order, and resolve discovery matters;(2)ADR: Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. Early Neutral Evaluation is approved. On the informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in a settlement conference conducted by the magistrate judge if the parties have engaged in an Early Neutral Evaluation and are unable to afford or otherwise attain private settlement assistance;(3)Hear and determine referred matters in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B). by Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/29/18. (msklc2, )
August 28, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The summons submitted is incomplete and not issued. Please file completed summons for issuance using the event Summons Request. (rvill, )
August 28, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (rvill, )
August 28, 2018 Filing 2 COMPLAINT Verified Complaint and Jury Demand against Charles Schwab and Company, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6268533)Attorney Joseph C. Cohen, Jr added to party Charlotte Ley(pty:pla), filed by Charlotte Ley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - RTS, #2 Exhibit 2- Performance Reviews, #3 Exhibit 3 - Weekly Report, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons, #6 Continuation of Main Document Motion to File Out of Time)(Cohen, Joseph)
August 28, 2018 Filing 1 Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ley v. Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlotte Ley
Represented By: Elwyn F. Schaefer
Represented By: Joseph C. Cohen, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Schwab and Company, Inc.
Represented By: Darin L. Mackender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?