Cester v. Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc.
Daniele Cester |
Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc. |
1:2018cv02258 |
August 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Wiley Y Daniel |
Nina Y Wang |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Plaintiff's ANSWER/REPLY to #12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim Defendant's Counterclaims, and Jury Demand by Daniele Cester.(Wegener, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND, COUNTERCLAIM S AGAINST PLAINTIFF CESTER against Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc. by Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc..(Vickles, Heather) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent R.E.D.Graniti S.p.A. for Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc.. (Vickles, Heather) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniele Cester. Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc. served on 9/6/2018, answer due 9/27/2018. (Schambach, David) |
Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 11/14/2018 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/10/2018. (jgonz, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David Ross Schambach on behalf of Daniele CesterAttorney David Ross Schambach added to party Daniele Cester(pty:pla) (Schambach, David) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Heather Fox Vickles on behalf of Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc.Attorney Heather Fox Vickles added to party Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc.(pty:dft) (Vickles, Heather) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (rkeec) |
Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02258-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (rkeec) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. (rkeec) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6275917)Attorney Benjamin Michael Wegener added to party Daniele Cester(pty:pla), filed by Daniele Cester. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Wegener, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cester v. Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Colorado Stone Quarries, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Heather Fox Vickles |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniele Cester | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Michael Wegener |
Represented By: | David Ross Schambach |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.