Jewell v. AspenPointe, Inc. et al
Gary Jewell |
Maria Berger and AspenPointe, Inc. |
1:2018cv02370 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Philip A Brimmer |
Kathleen M Tafoya |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Based on the #11 Notice of Settlement, the Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/2018 is vacated. The parties shall file appropriate dismissal documents no later than 11/28/2018. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 10/31/18. Text Only Entry (kmtlc1 ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate Scheduling Conference by Defendant AspenPointe, Inc. (Hegarty, Matthew) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendants AspenPointe, Inc., Maria Berger. AspenPointe, Inc. answer due 11/1/2018; Maria Berger answer due 11/1/2018. (Hegarty, Matthew) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary Jewell. Maria Berger served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Swan, Andrew) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary Jewell. AspenPointe, Inc. served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Swan, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 11/19/2018 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 101 (Colorado Springs) before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/19/2018. (ksena) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/18/18. Text Only Entry (pabsec) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael Dickson Kuhn on behalf of Gary JewellAttorney Michael Dickson Kuhn added to party Gary Jewell(pty:pla) (Kuhn, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Paul Forrest Lewis on behalf of Gary JewellAttorney Paul Forrest Lewis added to party Gary Jewell(pty:pla) (Lewis, Paul) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Gary Jewell (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6298086)Attorney Andrew Edward Swan added to party Gary Jewell(pty:pla), filed by Gary Jewell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons AspenPointe, Inc., #3 Summons Maria Berger)(Swan, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.