Wexler v. USA
| Warren Wexler |
| USA |
| 1:2018cv02378 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance (Amended) by Timothy Bart Jafek on behalf of USA (Jafek, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Timothy Bart Jafek on behalf of USAAttorney Timothy Bart Jafek added to party USA(pty:dft) (Jafek, Timothy) Modified on 10/25/2018 to note that this document was filed with the incorrect caption and case number and has been re-filed with the correct information at doc #7 (athom, ). |
Filing 5
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 12/17/2018 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 9/26/2018. (jgonz, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Magistrate Judge Varholak is designated to conduct ALLMTN proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiffs counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 10/18/2018 in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 90 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. FURTHER, Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/18/2018. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Summons Issued in Paper Format in the Clerks Office. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against USA Filing Fee: 400.00 Receipt Number: COX086780, filed by Warren Wexler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment)(rroge, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wexler v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Warren Wexler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Timothy Bart Jafek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
