Salazar v. Every Child Pediatrics
| Melinda Salazar |
| Every Child Pediatrics f/k/a Rocky Mountain Youth Medical & Nursing Consultants, Inc., Every Child Pediatrics and Rocky Mountain Youth Medical & Nursing Consultants, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv02379 |
| September 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| S Kato Crews |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katarina L. Harris on behalf of Every Child PediatricsAttorney Katarina L. Harris added to party Every Child Pediatrics(pty:dft) (Harris, Katarina) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER SETTING RULE 16(B) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. The Scheduling Conference is set for 12/17/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourt.gov, on or before seven (7) days prior to the Scheduling Conference (12/10/2018). SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 10/15/2018. Text Only Entry (skclc2, )
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Melinda Salazar. Every Child Pediatrics waiver sent on 9/27/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Lujan, Christopher) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/21/18. Text Only Entry (pabsec)
|
| Filing 5 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #4 Memorandum Returning Case. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 18-cv-02379-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (rkeec) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. (rkeec) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (rroge, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Wiley Y. Daniel and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (rroge, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Every Child Pediatrics f/k/a Rocky Mountain Youth Medical & Nursing Consultants, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400,Receipt Number 1082-6299777)Attorney Christopher M.A. Lujan added to party Melinda Salazar(pty:pla), filed by Melinda Salazar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons in a Civil Action)(Lujan, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
